Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2025; 13(1):46-53 (e2025131176).
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v13i1.176
Comparative effects of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their extracellular vesicles in a mouse model of parkinsonism
Labunets I.1,4
, Toporova O.1,2
, Panteleymonova T.1,4
, Dovbynchuk T.1,3
, Kyryk V.1,4
, Kashchuk O.1, Kordium V.1,2![]()
- 1Institute of Genetic and Regenerative Medicine, M. D. Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 2Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 3Educational and Scientific Centre “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 4D. F. Chebotarev State Institute of Gerontology, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSCs) in neurodegenerative diseases due to their trophic properties, suppression of inflammation at the lesion site, reduction of apoptosis, and stimulation of endogenous neurogenesis via the secretion of bioactive factors. Similar to the cells from which they originate, extracellular vesicles (EVs) exert therapeutic effects, including stimulation of cell migration and extracellular matrix synthesis, as well as anti-apoptotic, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities. Given their improved safety profile, EVs are considered a promising alternative to cell therapy for nervous system disorders.
The aim of study was to compare the effects of human umbilical cord-derived MMSCs (hUC-MMSCs) and their EVs on behavioral parameters, immune cell populations, and antioxidant defense in the brains of mice with an experimental model of parkinsonism.
Materials and methods. Parkinsonism was induced in 6–7 months old male 129/Sv mice by a single intraperitoneal injection of the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) at a dose of 30 mg/kg (control group). To assess therapeutic efficacy, either hUC-MMSCs (5×105 cells) or EVs derived from an equivalent number of cells were administered via tail vein injection 7 days post-induction. Flow cytometry was used to determine the percentages of CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD11b+ macrophages in brain cell suspensions. Biochemical analysis of brain homogenates was performed to assess malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and the activities of antioxidant enzymes glutathione peroxidase (GP) and glutathione reductase (GR). Motor and non-motor behaviors were evaluated using the open field, rigidity, memory, and rotarod tests.
Results. MPTP administration led to reduced motor, exploratory, and cognitive activity, and increased emotional reactivity compared to intact animals. An increase in brain macrophage content and MDA levels, along with a reduction in GP and GR activities, was also observed. hUC-MMSC transplantation partially restored emotional and motor functions, reduced macrophage numbers and MDA levels, and increased GP activity. However, it was associated with further suppression of some cognitive parameters, potentially related to the treatment regimen. EV administration similarly improved motor and emotional functions, but unlike hUC-MMSCs, did not impair cognitive performance. Moreover, EVs more effectively enhanced GP and GR activities and reduced brain macrophage levels compared to cell therapy.
Conclusions. Both hUC-MMSCs and their EVs improve CNS function in experimental parkinsonism by reducing macrophage infiltration and oxidative stress in the brain. The more pronounced beneficial effects observed with EVs suggest they may represent a promising and safer alternative to cell-based therapies for Parkinson’s disease.
Key words. umbilical cord-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells; extracellular vesicles; MPTP; parkinsonism; behavioral reactions; oxidative stress
Full text PDF
| 1. Karaban IN, Shalenko OV, Kryzhanovskiy SA. Non-motor symptoms in clinical picture of the Parkinson’s disease. International neurological journal. 2017. 1. P.58-63. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0713.1.87.2017.96538 |
||||
| 2. Sulzev D, Surmeiter DJ. Neuronal vulnerability, pathogenests and Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2013. 28. P.715-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25095 PMid:22791686 PMCid:PMC3578396 |
||||
| 3. Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhou J. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease and its potential as therapeutic target. Translat Neurodegenerat. 2015. 4(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-015-0042-0 PMid:26464797 PMCid:PMC4603346 |
||||
| 4. Guo J-D, Zhao X, Li Y., Li G-R, Liu X-L. Damage to dopaminergic neurons by oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2018. 41. P.1817-1825. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2018.3406 |
||||
| 5. Li Zh, Cheung H-H. Stem cell-based therapies for Parkinson desease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218060 PMid:33137927 PMCid:PMC7663462 |
||||
| 6. Xue Z, Liao Y, Li Ye. Effects of microenvironment and biological behavior on the paracrine function of stem cells. Genes & Diseases. 2024. 11(1). P. 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2023.03.013 PMid:37588208 PMCid:PMC10425798 |
||||
| 7. Paresishvili T, Kakabadze Z. Freeze-Dried Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Bench to Bedside. Advanced Biology. 2024. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202300155 PMid:37990389 |
||||
| 8. Börger V, Bremer M, Ferrer-Tur R, Gockeln L, Stambouli O, Becic A, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their potential as novel immunomodulatory therapeutic agents. Int J Mol Sci. 2017. 18(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071450 PMid:28684664 PMCid:PMC5535941 |
||||
| 9. Liew LC, Katsuda T, Gailhouste L, Nakagama H, Ochiya T. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a glimmer of hope in treating Alzheimer’s disease. Int Immunol. 2017. 29(1). P.11-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxx002 PMid:28184439 |
||||
| 10. Jung JW, Kwon M, Choi JC, Shin JW, Park IW, Choi BW, et al. Familial occurrence of pulmonary embolism after intravenous, adipose tissue-derived stem cell therapy. Yonsei Med J. 2013. 54(5). P.1293-1296. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2013.54.5.1293 PMid:23918585 PMCid:PMC3743204 |
||||
| 11. Mashouri L, Yousefi H, Aref AR, Ahadi AM, Molaei F, Alahari SK. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis,and mechanisms in cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Mol Cancer. 2019. 18(75). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0991-5 PMid:30940145 PMCid:PMC6444571 |
||||
| 12. Chen Y-F, Luh F, Ho Y-S, Yen Y. Exosomes: a review of biologic function, diagnostic and targeted therapy applications, and clinical trials. J Biomed Sci. 2024. 31. Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-024-01055-0 PMid:38992695 PMCid:PMC11238361 |
||||
| 13. Nouri Z, Barfar A, Perseh S, Motasadizadeh H, Maghsoudian S, Fatahi Y, Nouri K, et al. Exosomes as therapeutic and drug delivery vehicle for neurodegenerative diseases. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024. 22 (1). Article 463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02681-4 PMid:39095888 PMCid:PMC11297769 |
||||
| 14. Ramos Zaldivar HM, Polakovicova I, Salas Huenuleo E, Corvalan AH, Kogan MJ, Yefi CL. Extracellular vesicles through the blood-brain barrier: a review. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022. 19(1).Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00359-3 PMid:35879759 PMCid:PMC9310691 |
||||
| 15. Putthanbut N, Lee JY, Borlongan CV. Extracellular vesicle therapy in neurological disorders. J Biomed Sci. 2024. 31/Article 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-024-01075-w PMid:39183263 PMCid:PMC11346291 |
||||
| 16. Lykhmus O, Kalashnyk O, Skok M, Deryabina O, Toporova O, Pokholenko I, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate cognitive impairment caused by neuroinflammation in young but not aged mice. Explor Neurosci. 2024. 3. Р.207-218. https://doi.org/10.37349/en.2024.00045 |
||||
| 17. Labunets IF, Utko NA, Savosko S, Panteleymonova TN, Butenko GM. Changes in nigral neuronal structure, indices of antioxidant protection of the brain and behavior in mice of different age with MPTP parkinsonism model. International neurological journal. 2020. 16(3). P.7-15. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0713.16.3.2020.203444 |
||||
| 18. Zeng XS, Geng WS, Jia JJ. Neurotoxin-induced animal models of Parkinson disease: pathogenic mechanism and assessment. ASN Neuro. 2018. 10(1).Р.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1177/1759091418777438 PMid:29809058 PMCid:PMC5977437 |
||||
| 19. Janakiraman U, Manivasagam T, Thenmorhi AJ, Essa MM, Barathidasan R,SaravanaBabu C, et al.. Influence of chronic mild stress exposure on motor, non-motor impairments and neurochemical variables in specific brain areas of MPTP/Probenecid induced neurotoxicity in mice. PLoS ONE. 2016. 11(1). е0146671. d https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146671 PMid:26765842 PMCid:PMC4713092 |
||||
| 20. Labunets I, Panteleymonova T, Kyryk V, Toporova O, Pikus P, Litoschenko Z.. The effects of human umbilical cord-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells transplantation in mice of different strains with an experimental model of parkinsonism. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023. 11(2). P.96-103. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.155 |
||||
| 21. Rymar S, Pikus P, Buchek P, Shuvalova N, Pokholenko Ia, Irodov D, Kordium V. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of hUC-MSC intravenous delivery and intraperitoneal administration of MSCs encapsulated in alginate capsules for treatment of rat liver cirrhosis. BioRxiv. 2021. 4(26). P.441497. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.441497 |
||||
| 22. Coughlan C, Bruce K, Burgy O, Boyd TD, Michel CR, Garcia-Perez J, et al. Exosome Isolation by Ultracentrifugation and Precipitation: A Comparison of Techniques for Downstream Analyses. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2020. 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpcb.110 PMid:32633898 PMCid:PMC8088761 |
||||
| 23. Alam G, Edler M, Burchfield S, Richardson JR. Single Low Doses of MPTP Decrease Tyrosine Hydroxylase Expression in the Absence of Overt Neuron Loss. Neurotoxicology. 2017. 60. P.99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2017.03.008 PMid:28377118 PMCid:PMC5499677 |
||||
| 24. Huang L, Xiao D, Sun H, Su H.. Behavioral tests for evaluating the characteristics of brain diseases in rodent models: Optimal choices for improved outcomes. Mol.med.reports. 2022. 25(5). Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2022.12699 PMid:35348193 |
||||
| 25. Лабунець ІФ, Пантелеймонова ТМ, Михальський СА, Топорова ОК. Немоторні порушення поведінки і структура нейронів гіпокампа при експериментальному паркінсонізмі та після введення мультипотентних мезенхімальних стромальних клітин пуповини людини і мелатоніну. International neurological journal. 2024. 20(8). С.435-445. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0713.20.8.2024.1127 |
||||
| 26. Fisch GS. Animal models and human neuropsychiatric disorders. Behav.Genet. 2007. 37(1). P.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-006-9117-0 PMid:17047896 |
||||
| 27. Navarro D, Gasparyan A, Marti Martinez S et al. Methods to identify cognitive alterations from animals to human: A Translational Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023. 24(8). P.7653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087653 PMid:37108813 PMCid:PMC10143375 |
||||
| 28. Gore M. Spectrophotometry & Spectrofluorimetry. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199638130.001.0001 |
||||
| 29. Dean RT, Fu S, Stocker R, Davies MJ. Biochemistry and pathology of radical-mediated protein oxidation. Biochem. J. 1997. 324(1). P.1- 18. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3240001 PMid:9164834 PMCid:PMC1218394 |
||||
| 30. Beers Jr RF, Sizer IW. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem. 1952. 195(1). Р.133-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50881-X PMid:14938361 |
||||
| 31. Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J. Clin. Med. 1967. 70(1). P.158-169. PMID 6066618 | ||||
| 32. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976. 72. P.248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 PMid:942051 |
||||
| 33. Uchiyama M., Mihara M. Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem. 1978. 86(1). P. 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(78)90342-1 PMid:655387 |
||||
| 34. Labunets IF, Panteleymonova TM, Utko NO, Kyryk V.M., Savosko S.I., Litochenko Z.L. Changes in the number of macrophages, T-lymphocytes, activity of antioxidant enzymes in the brain, behavior and structure of the central nervous system neurons in adult and aging mice of different strains with the MPTP-induced model of parkinsonism. International Neurological Journal (Ukraine). 2023. 19(4). P.119-128. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0713.19.4.2023.1010 |
||||
| 35. Jagmag SA, Tripathi N., Shukla SD, Maithis S, Khurana S. Evaluation of modeles of Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2016. 9:503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00503 PMid:26834536 PMCid:PMC4718050 |
||||
| 36. Zhu G, Li J, He L, Wang X, Hong X. MPTP-induced changes in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory are prevented by memantine through the BDNF-TrkB pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2015. 172. P.2354-2368. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13061 PMid:25560396 PMCid:PMC4403099 |
||||
| 37. Gonzalez H, Pacheco R. T-cell-mediated regulation of neuroinflammation involved in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuroinflammation. 2014. 11:201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0201-8 PMid:25441979 PMCid:PMC4258012 |
||||
| 38. Hiu-Ngar S, Wu Sh-L, Wang W-F, Chen Ch-H, Huang Y-T, Liou Y-M et al. MPTP-induced dopaminergic degeneration and deficits in object recognition in rats are accompanied by neuroinflammation in the hippocampus. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010. 95(2). Р. 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2009.12.020 PMid:20064549 |
||||
| 39. Konovalov S, Moroz V, Deryabina O, Shuvalova N, Tochylovsky A, Klymenko P, Kordium V. The effect of mesenchymal stromal cells of different origin on morphological parameters in the somatosensory cortex of rats with acute cerebral ischemia. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023. 11(1). P.46-52. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i1.149 |
||||
| 40. Rolando C, Taylor V. Neural stem cell of the hippocampus: development, physiology regulation, and dysfunction in disease. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2014. 107. P.183-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416022-4.00007-X PMid:24439807 |
||||
| 41. Zhang L, Wang LM, Chen WW, Ma Z, Han X, Liu CM et al. Neural differentiation of human Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves the recovery of neurological function after transplantation in ischemic stroke rats. Neural Regen Res. 2017.12(7). Р.1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.211189 PMid:28852392 PMCid:PMC5558489 |
||||
| 42. Angeloni C, Gatti M, Prata C, Hrelia S, Maraldi T. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in counteracting oxidative stress-related neurodegeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. 21 (9):3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093299 PMid:32392722 PMCid:PMC7246730 |
||||
| 43. Lukhmus O, Koval L, Voytenko L, Uspenska K, Komisarenko S, Deryabina O et al. Intravenously injected mesenchymal stem cells penetrate the brain and treat inflammation-induced brain damage and memory impairment in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2019. 10. Article 355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00355 PMid:31057400 PMCid:PMC6479176 |
||||
| 44. Mukai T, Mon Y, Shimazu T, Takahashi A, Tsunoda H, Yamaquchi S et al. Intravenous injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells attrnuates reactive gliosis and hypomyelination in neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage model. Neuroscience. 2017. 355. P. 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.006 PMid:28504197 |
||||
| 45. Dabrowski FA, Burdzinska A, Kulesza A, Sladowska A, Zolocinska A, Gala K et al. Comparison of the paracrine activity of mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord, amniotic membrane and adipose tissue. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017. 43(11). P. 1758-1768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13432 PMid:28707770 |
||||
| 46. Zhang W, Wang T, Xue Y, Zhan B, Lai Z, Huang W. et al. Research progress of extracellular vesicles and exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of oxidative stress-related diseases. Front Immunol. 023.14:1238789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238789 PMid:37646039 PMCid:PMC10461809 |
||||
Labunets I, Toporova O, Panteleymonova T, Dovbynchuk T, Kyryk V, Kashchuk O, Kordium V. Comparative effects of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their extracellular vesicles in a mouse model of parkinsonism. Cell Organ Transpl. 2025; 13(1):46-53 (e2025131176). doi: https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v13i1.176

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

