Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2024; 12(2):110-117 (e2024122171)
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v12i2.171
The effect of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on reparative processes during the reconstruction of muscle-aponeurotic defects of the anterior abdominal wall in rats
Varvaruk M-I.
, Dovgalyuk A.
, Dzubanovsky I.
, Holovata T.
, Shevchuk O.![]()
- I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
Abstract
Postoperative ventral hernias represent a serious challenge in modern surgery, arising as complications after abdominal surgeries due to weakness or defects in the musculo-aponeurotic structure of the anterior abdominal wall. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit high reparative potential due to their ability to paracrinally stimulate the regeneration of damaged recipient’s tissues.
Objective. To establish the effect of intraperitoneal transplantation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) on the regeneration of muscle fibers in the area of musculo-aponeurotic defect reconstruction of the anterior abdominal wall in rats.
Materials and methods. A surgical model of a musculo-aponeurotic defect (2 cm in diameter) of the anterior abdominal wall was created in 72 white rats. The animals were divided into four groups depending on the method of defect reconstruction:1 – reconstruction using autologous tissue; 2 – reconstruction using autologous tissue combined with MSC injection; 3 – reconstruction using a polypropylene mesh; 4 – reconstruction using a polypropylene mesh combined with MSC injection. hUC-MSCs were isolated from umbilical tissue using an enzymatic method. The expression of surface markers validated using flow cytometry. hUC-MSCs were administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 1 million cells per kg of body weight. On the 10th and 30th days, histological sections of anterior abdominal wall tissues in the area of the musculo-aponeurotic defect reconstruction were analyzed for the presence of granulation tissue, collagen fibers, newly formed connective tissue, and cellular infiltration. Morphometric analysis was performed to compare the relative areas of granulation and fibroreticular tissue, microcirculatory vessels, and the number of neutrophilic leukocytes, lymphohistiocytic elements, and fibroblasts per mm² of the section area.
Results. In Group 1, loose connective tissue rich in fibroblasts and histiocytes was observed in the area of reconstruction. In Group 2, a significantly lower intensity of the cellular response was noted, combined with the formation of denser connective tissue bundles; in the areas of muscle fiber damage, cross-striations were more distinctly visualized. On the 10th day, the area of granulation tissue was 34.6 % smaller, and the area of microcirculatory vessels was 15.9 % smaller compared to the first group and 28.1 % and 57.2 %, respectively, compared to Group 3 at the same time point. In Group 3, granulation tissue formed in areas of necrosis and muscle fiber destruction. The best results were obtained in Group 4 (polypropylene mesh with MSCs), where complete resolution of the inflammatory response and scar tissue formation were observed. On the 10th day, the granulation tissue area in Group 4 was 2.5 times smaller compared to the first group, 1.3 times smaller compared to Group 2 and 2.5 times smaller compared to Group 3. The relative area of microcirculatory vessels in Group 4 was 1.8 times smaller compared to Group 1, 1.3 times smaller compared to Group 2, and 1.8 times smaller compared to Group 3. The relative area of fibroreticular tissue was 3.2 times larger compared to Group 1, 1.2 times larger compared to Group 2, and 2.3 times larger compared to Group 3. The fibroblast count per mm² was higher, while the neutrophil count was lower, contributing to proper scar formation. On the 30th day, no granulation tissue, microcirculatory vessels, or leukocytes were observed.
Conclusion. Intraperitoneal transplantation of hUC-MSCs in addition to the use of polypropylene mesh as a mean of reconstruction of musculo-aponeurotic anterior abdominal wall defect in rats enhances regeneration in the area of the modeled defect and promotes rapid healing.
Keywords: musculo-aponeurotic defect; postoperative hernias; hernioplasty; human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells; cell transplantation
Full text PDF
| 1. Hrubnik VV, Parfentieva ND, Parfentiev RS, Kolker IA, Solodovnikova YuO, Chemersiuk IH, et al. Functional state of the abdominal wall muscles in postoperative abdominal hernias: modern clinical instruments of diagnosis and prognosis. The Ukrainian Journal of Clinical Surgery. 2018; 1:59 – 62. https://doi.org/10.26779/2522-1396.2018.01.59 |
||||
| 2. Palermo M, Acquafresca PA, Bruno M, Tarsitano F. Hernioplasty with and without mesh: analysis of the immediate complications in a randomized controlled clinical trial. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015; 28(3):157-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202015000300002 PMid:26537136 PMCid:PMC4737351 |
||||
| 3. Gómez-Gil V, Pascual G, Bellón JM. Biomaterial implants in abdominal wall hernia repair: A review on the importance of the peritoneal interface. Processes. 2019; 7(2):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7020105 |
||||
| 4. Saiding Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Pereira CL, Sarmento B, Cui W, et al. Abdominal wall hernia repair: From prosthetic meshes to smart materials. Mater Today Bio. 2023; 100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100691 PMid:37455815 PMCid:PMC10339210 |
||||
| 5. Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, Alawadi ZM, Gonzalez JRF, Askenasy EP, et al. Ventral hernia management. Ann Surg. 2017; 265(1):80-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701 PMid:28009730 |
||||
| 6. Faylona JM. Evolution of ventral hernia repair. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017; 10(3):252-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12392 PMid:28631265 |
||||
| 7. Garcia-Urena MA, Berrevoet D, Cuccurullo K, Decaestecker M, Lopez-Cano J, Molina Villar JM, et al. Preventing incisional ventral hernias: important for patients but ignored by surgical specialities? A critical review. Hernia. 2021; 25:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02348-7 PMid:33394256 |
||||
| 8. Nofal MN, Yousef AJ, Hamdan FF, Oudat AH. Characteristics of trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):2868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59721-w PMid:32071382 PMCid:PMC7029008 |
||||
| 9. Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, Granderath FA, Berrevoet F, Muysoms FE, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia. 2016; 20:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8 PMid:25846740 |
||||
| 10. Ki HJ, Park JB, Sul JY. Umbilical port site hernia and diastasis recti. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2020; 23(2):80. https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2020.23.2.80 PMid:35600062 PMCid:PMC8985617 |
||||
| 11. Han Y, Li X, Zhang Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Cells 2019; 8: 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080886 PMid:31412678 PMCid:PMC6721852 |
||||
| 12. Wang Y, Fang J, Liu B, Shao C, Shi Y. Reciprocal regulation of mesenchymal stem cells and immune responses. Cell Stem Cell. 2022; 29(11):1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2022.10.001 PMid:36332569 |
||||
| 13. Grabovyi OM, Nevmerzhytska NM, Yaremenko LM, Kostynskyi HB, Demydchuk AS, Kondaurova HY. Mesenchymal stem cells: diversity. Pathologia. 2023;20(1):76-84. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2023.1.272938 |
||||
| 14. Pittenger MF, Discher DE, Péault BM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell perspective: cell biology to clinical progress. NPJ Regen Med. 2019;4:22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0083-6 PMid:31815001 PMCid:PMC6889290 |
||||
| 15. Margiana R, Markov A, Zekiy AO, et al. Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cell in regenerative medicine: a narrative review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022; 13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03054-0 PMid:35902958 PMCid:PMC9330677 |
||||
| 16. Redko O, Dovgalyuk A, Kramar S, Ohinska N, Nebesna Z, Korda M. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy modulates macrophage dynamics in ARDS-associated liver injury in rats. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023; 11(2):114-121. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.157 |
||||
| 17. Palii I, Dovgalyuk A, Kramar S, Korda M. Immunohistochemical analysis of macrophage subpopulations in the kidneys of rats with acute respiratory distress syndrome under the conditions of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Cell Organ Transpl. 2024; 12(2):e2024122170. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v12i2.170 |
||||
| 18. Saeedi P, Halabian R, Imani Fooladi AA. A revealing review of mesenchymal stem cells therapy, clinical perspectives and modification strategies. Stem Cell Investig. 2019; 6:34. https://doi.org/10.21037/sci.2019.08.11 PMid:31620481 PMCid:PMC6789202 |
||||
| 19. Caplan AI. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name! Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017; 6(6):1445-1451. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0051 PMid:28452204 PMCid:PMC5689741 |
||||
| 20. Pittenger MF, Discher DE, Péault BM, Phinney DG, Hare JM, Caplan AI, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell perspective: Cell biology to clinical progress. NPJ Regen Med. 2019; 4:22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0083-6 PMid:31815001 PMCid:PMC6889290 |
||||
| 21. Le Blanc K, Davies LC. Mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune response. Immunol Lett. 2018; 205:10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2018.10.006 PMid:30336182 |
||||
Varvaruk M-I, Dovgalyuk A, Dzubanovsky I, Holovata T, Shevchuk O. The effect of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on reparative processes during the reconstruction of muscle-aponeurotic defects of the anterior abdominal wall in rats. Cell Organ Transpl. 2024; 12(2):110-117 (e2024122171). doi: https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v12i2.171

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

