Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain

Home/2023, Vol. 11, No. 2/Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain

Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2023; 11(2):122-129.
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v11i2.159

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain

Konovalov S.1, Moroz V.1, Konovalova N.1, Deryabina O.2, Toporova O.2,3, Tochylovsky A.4, Kordium V.2,3

  • 1National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
  • 2Institute of Genetic and Regenerative Medicine, M. D. Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 3Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 4BioTexCom LLC, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Neuroprotective therapy for acute cerebrovascular accident is directly aimed at preserving the neurons of the penumbra, but the regeneration of glia in the affected area is also important. Glial cells have fast reactivity and are very sensitive to ischemic cerebral injury. New experimental studies have demonstrated the successful use of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSCs) in stroke to modulate microglial activation.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of MMSCs of different origin, MMSC lysate and citicoline on glial components in the brain ischemia-reperfusion model in rats.
Methods. The experiments were conducted on 190 4-month-old male Wistar rats weighing 160-190 g. After modeling ischemia-reperfusion of the brain by bilateral 20-minute occlusion of the internal carotid arteries, the animals were intravenously injected with human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs, human and rat adipose tissue-derived MMSCs at a dose of 1×106 cells/animal. Other groups were injected with fetal rat fibroblasts 1×106 cells/animal in 0.2 mL 0.9 % saline or lysate from umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs (0.2 mL/animal). Control animals were injected i.v. with 0.9 % saline. The last group of rats received a single dose of the reference drug citicoline at a dose of 250 mg/kg. On the 7th and 14th days, the area and fluorescence intensity of cells expressing markers of astrocytes (GFAP), microglia (Iba1), and oligodendrocytes (Rip) were quantitatively assessed on sections of the hippocampal CA1 area using immunohistochemical examination with confocal microscopy.
Results. On the 7th and 14th days after ischemia-reperfusion in rats, the fluorescence intensity of GFAP-positive astrocytes and Iba1-positive microglial cells increased, which indicated pronounced reactive astrogliosis and activation of microglia in the CA1 area of the hippocampus. At the same time, ischemia-reperfusion did not significantly affect the content of Rip-positive oligodendrocytes in brain slices. The use of all treatment options (transplantation of MMSCs of different origin, their lysate, or the reference drug citicoline) had a cytoprotective effect and reduced reactive astro- and microgliosis, both on the 7th and 14th days after the injury. The best result was demonstrated by the treatment with human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs.
Conclusion. Brain ischemia-reperfusion induces reactive gliosis by activating GFAP-positive and Iba1-positive glial cells in all layers of the hippocampus. The use of human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs and fetal rat fibroblasts significantly reduces its intensity both on the 7th and on the 14th days after modeling the ischemic brain injury.

Key words: ischemic brain injury; hippocampus; glia; neuroprotection; multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells; citicoline


Full Text PDF

1. Fricker M, Tolkovsky AM, Borutaite V, Coleman M, Brown GC. Neuronal cell death. Phys-iol Rev. 2018; 98:813-880.
https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00011.2017
PMid:29488822 PMCid:PMC5966715
2. Chu X, Fu X, Zou L, Qi C, Li Z, Rao Y, et al. Oncosis, the possible death pathway in astro-cytes after focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2007; 1149:157-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.061
PMid:17433269
3. De Biase LM, Schuebel KE, Fusfeld ZH, et al. Local cues establish and maintain region-specific phenotypes of basal ganglia microglia. Neuron. 2017; 95:341-356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.020
PMid:28689984 PMCid:PMC5754189
4. Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Tucker AF, Collins HY, Mulinyawe SB, Barres BA. Diverse requirements for microglial survival, specification, and function revealed by defined-medium cultures. Neuron. 2017; 94:759-773.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.043
PMid:28521131 PMCid:PMC5523817
5. Michell-Robinson MA, Touil H, Healy LM, et al. Roles of microglia in brain development, tissue maintenance and repair. Brain. 2015;138:1138- 1159.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv066
PMid:25823474 PMCid:PMC5963417
6. Desai SM, Rocha M, Jovin TG, Jadhav AP. High variability in neuronal loss. Stroke. 2019; 50:34-37.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023499
PMid:30566036
7. Dabrowska S, Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M. Neuroinflammation as a target for treatment of stroke using mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles. J Neuroinflammation. 2019; 16:178.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1571-8
PMid:31514749 PMCid:PMC6743114
8. Kassis H, Chopp M, Xian Shuang LX, Shehadah A, Roberts C, Zheng Gang Zhang. Histone deacetylase expression in white matter oligodendrocytes after stroke. Neurochem Int. 2014; 77:17-23. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.03.006
PMid:24657831 PMCid:PMC4332872
9. Shafie M, Yu W. Recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlu-sion: Where we are and what comes next? Transl Stroke Res. 2021; 12:369-381.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00879-w
PMid:33409732 PMCid:PMC8055567
10. Baker EW, Kinder HA, West FD. Neural stem cell therapy for stroke: A multimechanistic approach to restoring neurological function. Brain Behav. 2018; 9:e01214
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1214
PMid:30747485 PMCid:PMC6422715
11. https://doi.org/Surugiu R, Olaru A, Hermann DM, Glavan D, Catalin B, Popa-Wagner A. Recent advances in mono- and combined stem cell therapies of stroke in animal models and humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:6029.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236029
PMid:31795466 PMCid:PMC6928803
12. Yoshida Y, Takagi T, Kuramoto Y, Tatebayashi K, Shirakawa M, Yamahara K, et al. Intrave-nous administration of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells in the subacute phase of cerebral infarction in a mouse model ameliorates neurological disturbance by suppressing blood brain barrier disruption and apoptosis via immunomodulation. Cell Transplant. 2021; 30.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897211024183
PMid:34144647 PMCid:PMC8216398
13. Zhang Lei, Wang Lin-Mei, Chen Wei-Wei, Ma Zhi, Han Xiao, Liu Cheng-Ming, et al. Neural differentiation of human Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves the recovery of neurological function after transplantation in ischemic stroke rats. Neural Re-generation Research. 2017; 12(7):1103-1110.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.211189
PMid:28852392 PMCid:PMC5558489
14. Li J, Zhang Q, Wang W, Lin F, Wang S, Zhao J. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: a look into treatment mechanism and therapeutic potential. J Neurol. 2020; 1-13:4095-4107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10138-5
PMid:32761505
15. Wang F, Tang H, Zhu J, Zhang JH. Transplanting mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of ischemic stroke. Cell Transplant. 2018; 27(12):1825-1834.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689718795424
PMid:30251564 PMCid:PMC6300770
16. Li Z, Ye H, Cai X, et al. Bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells modulate microglial activa-tion in the peri-infarct area in rats during the acute phase of stroke. Brain Res Bull. 2019; 153:324-333.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.001
PMid:31589902
17. Nam HS, Kwon I, Lee BH, Kim H, Kim J, An S, et al. Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment on the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Angiogenesis during Ischemic Stroke Recovery. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0144218.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144218
PMid:26637168 PMCid:PMC4670145
18. He B, Yao Q, Liang Z, Lin J, Xie Y, Li S, et al. The Dose of Intravenously Transplanted Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Determines the Therapeutic Effect on Vascular Remodeling in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke. Cell Transplant. 2016; 25(12):2173-2185.
https://doi.org/10.3727/096368916X692627
PMid:27480476
19. Chen Y, Peng D, Li J, Zhang L, Chen J, Wang L, et al. A comparative study of different dos-es of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve post-stroke neurological out-comes via intravenous transplantation. Brain Res. 2023; 1798:148161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148161
PMid:36379315
20. Kawabori M, Kuroda S, Ito M, Shichinohe H, Houkin K, Kuge Y, et al. Timing and cell dose determine therapeutic effects of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in rat model of cerebral infarct. Neuropathology. 2013; 33(2):140-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01335.x
PMid:22725254
21. Available from: https://zakononline.com.ua/documents/show/32024___32024
22. Lyden J, Grant S, Ma T. Altered metabolism for neuroprotection provided by mesenchymal stem cells. Brain Circ. 2019; 5:140-144.
https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_36_19
PMid:31620662 PMCid:PMC6785946
23. Konovalov S, Moroz V, Konovalova N, Deryabina O, Shuvalova N, Toporova O, et al. The effect of mesenchymal stromal cells of various origins on mortality and neurologic deficit in acute cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Cell Organ Transpl. 2021; 9(2):104-108.
https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v9i2.132
24. Konovalov SV, Moroz VM, Deryabina OG, et al. Restoration of the nervous system in acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain by intravenous administration of mesenchymal stromal cells of different origin. Adv Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2023; 9(1):60-65.
https://doi.org/10.15406/atroa.2023.09.00142
25. Khodakovsky AA, Marinich LI, Bagauri OV. Features of postreperfusion neuronal damage formation – characterization of the “ischemia-reperfusion” model. New directions and pro-spects for the development of modern cerebroprotective therapy of ischemic stroke. Physi-cian Assistant. 2013; 3(58): 69-76. [In Russian]
26. Chen Y, Peng D, Li J, Zhang L, Chen J, Wang L, et al. A comparative study of different dos-es of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve post-stroke neurological out-comes via intravenous transplantation. Brain Res. 2023; 1798:148161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148161
PMid:36379315
27. Kawabori M, Kuroda S, Ito M, Shichinohe H, Houkin K, Kuge Y, et al. Timing and cell dose determine therapeutic effects of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in rat model of cerebral infarct. Neuropathology. 2013; 33(2):140-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01335.x
PMid:22725254
28. Secades JJ. Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review. Rev Neurol. 2016; 63(03):1-73.
https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.75S05.2022311
PMid:36544369
29. Diederich K, Frauenknecht K, Minnerup J, et al. Citicoline enhances neuroregenerative pro-cesses after experimental stroke in rats [published correction appears in Stroke. 2012; 43(11):e169. Stroke. 2012; 43(7):1931-1940.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.654806
PMid:22581817
30. Bustamante A, Giralt D, Garcia-Bonilla L, et al. Citicoline in pre-clinical animal models of stroke: a meta-analysis shows the optimal neuroprotective profile and the missing steps for jumping into a stroke clinical trial. J Neurochem. 2012; 123(2):217-225.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07891.x
PMid:22845688
31. Mehta A, Mahale R, Buddaraju K, et al. Efficacy of Neuroprotective Drugs in Acute Is-chemic Stroke: Is It Helpful? JNRP. 2019; 10(4):576-581. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-170079
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700790
PMid:31831974 PMCid:PMC6906097
32. Lee MC, Jin CY, Kim HS, et al. Stem cell dynamics in an experimental model of stroke. CMJ. 2011; 47(2):90-98.
https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2011.47.2.90
PMid:22111067 PMCid:PMC3214868
33. Pedachenko EG, Moroz VV, Yatsyk VA, Malyar UI, Liubich LD, Egorova DM. Autologous cell using for the restoration of functional defects in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular accident. 2020; 33(3):83-93.
https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2020-3(33)-83-93
34. Toyoshima A, Yasuhara T, Kameda M, Morimoto J, Takeuchi H, Wang F. Intra-arterial transplantation of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells mounts neuroprotective effects in a transient ischemic stroke model in rats: analyses of therapeutic time window and its mecha-nisms. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0127302.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127302
PMid:26075717 PMCid:PMC4468176
35. Lee MC, Jin CY, Kim HS, et al. Stem cell dynamics in an experimental model of stroke. CMJ. 2011; 47(2):90-98.
https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2011.47.2.90
PMid:22111067 PMCid:PMC3214868
36. Molofsky Av, Krenick R, Ullian E, et al. Astrocytes and disease: a neurodevelopmental per-spective. Genes Dev. 2012; 26(9):891-907.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.188326.112
PMid:22549954 PMCid:PMC3347787
37. Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron. 2014; 81(2):229-248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034
PMid:24462092 PMCid:PMC3984950
38. Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015; 7(2):a020420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020420
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020420
PMid:25380660 PMCid:PMC4315924
39. Liu Z, Li Y, Cui Y, Roberts C, Lu M, Wilhelmsson U, et al. Beneficial effects of gfap/vimentin reactive astrocytes for axonal remodeling and motor behavioral recovery in mice after stroke. Glia. 2014; 62:2022-2033.
https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22723
PMid:25043249 PMCid:PMC4307923
40. Ohtake Y, Li S. Molecular mechanisms of scar-sourced axon growth inhibitors. Brain Res. 2015, 1619:22-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.064
PMid:25192646 PMCid:PMC4345149
41. Asgari Taei A, Nasoohi S, Hassanzadeh G, Kadivar M, Dargahi L, Farahmandfar M. En-hancement of angiogenesis and neurogenesis by intracerebroventricular injection of secre-tome from human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells in ischemic stroke model. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021; 140:111709.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111709
PMid:34020250
42. Seo HG, Yi Y, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Neuroprotective effect of secreted factors from human adi-pose stem cells in a rat stroke model. Neurol Res. 2017; 39(12):1114-1124.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2017.1379293
PMid:28948857
43. Li Z, Ye H, Cai X, Sun W, He B, Yang Z, et al. Bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells mod-ulate microglial activation in the peri-infarct area in rats during the acute phase of stroke. Brain Res Bull. 2019; 153:324-333.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.001
PMid:31589902
44. Hsieh JY, Wang HW, Chang SJ, Liao KH, Lee IH, Lin WS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord express preferentially secreted factors related to neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e72604.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072604
PMid:23991127 PMCid:PMC3749979

Konovalov S, Moroz V, Konovalova N, Deryabina O, Toporova O, Tochylovsky A, Kordium V. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023; 11(2):122-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.159

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.