Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2023; 11(2):122-129.
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v11i2.159
Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain
Konovalov S.1
, Moroz V.1
, Konovalova N.1
, Deryabina O.2
, Toporova O.2,3
, Tochylovsky A.4, Kordium V.2,3![]()
- 1National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
- 2Institute of Genetic and Regenerative Medicine, M. D. Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine
- 3Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 4BioTexCom LLC, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
Neuroprotective therapy for acute cerebrovascular accident is directly aimed at preserving the neurons of the penumbra, but the regeneration of glia in the affected area is also important. Glial cells have fast reactivity and are very sensitive to ischemic cerebral injury. New experimental studies have demonstrated the successful use of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MMSCs) in stroke to modulate microglial activation.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of MMSCs of different origin, MMSC lysate and citicoline on glial components in the brain ischemia-reperfusion model in rats.
Methods. The experiments were conducted on 190 4-month-old male Wistar rats weighing 160-190 g. After modeling ischemia-reperfusion of the brain by bilateral 20-minute occlusion of the internal carotid arteries, the animals were intravenously injected with human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs, human and rat adipose tissue-derived MMSCs at a dose of 1×106 cells/animal. Other groups were injected with fetal rat fibroblasts 1×106 cells/animal in 0.2 mL 0.9 % saline or lysate from umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs (0.2 mL/animal). Control animals were injected i.v. with 0.9 % saline. The last group of rats received a single dose of the reference drug citicoline at a dose of 250 mg/kg. On the 7th and 14th days, the area and fluorescence intensity of cells expressing markers of astrocytes (GFAP), microglia (Iba1), and oligodendrocytes (Rip) were quantitatively assessed on sections of the hippocampal CA1 area using immunohistochemical examination with confocal microscopy.
Results. On the 7th and 14th days after ischemia-reperfusion in rats, the fluorescence intensity of GFAP-positive astrocytes and Iba1-positive microglial cells increased, which indicated pronounced reactive astrogliosis and activation of microglia in the CA1 area of the hippocampus. At the same time, ischemia-reperfusion did not significantly affect the content of Rip-positive oligodendrocytes in brain slices. The use of all treatment options (transplantation of MMSCs of different origin, their lysate, or the reference drug citicoline) had a cytoprotective effect and reduced reactive astro- and microgliosis, both on the 7th and 14th days after the injury. The best result was demonstrated by the treatment with human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs.
Conclusion. Brain ischemia-reperfusion induces reactive gliosis by activating GFAP-positive and Iba1-positive glial cells in all layers of the hippocampus. The use of human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived MMSCs and fetal rat fibroblasts significantly reduces its intensity both on the 7th and on the 14th days after modeling the ischemic brain injury.
Key words: ischemic brain injury; hippocampus; glia; neuroprotection; multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells; citicoline
Full Text PDF
| 1. Fricker M, Tolkovsky AM, Borutaite V, Coleman M, Brown GC. Neuronal cell death. Phys-iol Rev. 2018; 98:813-880. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00011.2017 PMid:29488822 PMCid:PMC5966715 |
||||
| 2. Chu X, Fu X, Zou L, Qi C, Li Z, Rao Y, et al. Oncosis, the possible death pathway in astro-cytes after focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2007; 1149:157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.061 PMid:17433269 |
||||
| 3. De Biase LM, Schuebel KE, Fusfeld ZH, et al. Local cues establish and maintain region-specific phenotypes of basal ganglia microglia. Neuron. 2017; 95:341-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.020 PMid:28689984 PMCid:PMC5754189 |
||||
| 4. Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Tucker AF, Collins HY, Mulinyawe SB, Barres BA. Diverse requirements for microglial survival, specification, and function revealed by defined-medium cultures. Neuron. 2017; 94:759-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.043 PMid:28521131 PMCid:PMC5523817 |
||||
| 5. Michell-Robinson MA, Touil H, Healy LM, et al. Roles of microglia in brain development, tissue maintenance and repair. Brain. 2015;138:1138- 1159. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv066 PMid:25823474 PMCid:PMC5963417 |
||||
| 6. Desai SM, Rocha M, Jovin TG, Jadhav AP. High variability in neuronal loss. Stroke. 2019; 50:34-37. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023499 PMid:30566036 |
||||
| 7. Dabrowska S, Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M. Neuroinflammation as a target for treatment of stroke using mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles. J Neuroinflammation. 2019; 16:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1571-8 PMid:31514749 PMCid:PMC6743114 |
||||
| 8. Kassis H, Chopp M, Xian Shuang LX, Shehadah A, Roberts C, Zheng Gang Zhang. Histone deacetylase expression in white matter oligodendrocytes after stroke. Neurochem Int. 2014; 77:17-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.03.006 PMid:24657831 PMCid:PMC4332872 |
||||
| 9. Shafie M, Yu W. Recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlu-sion: Where we are and what comes next? Transl Stroke Res. 2021; 12:369-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00879-w PMid:33409732 PMCid:PMC8055567 |
||||
| 10. Baker EW, Kinder HA, West FD. Neural stem cell therapy for stroke: A multimechanistic approach to restoring neurological function. Brain Behav. 2018; 9:e01214 https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1214 PMid:30747485 PMCid:PMC6422715 |
||||
| 11. https://doi.org/Surugiu R, Olaru A, Hermann DM, Glavan D, Catalin B, Popa-Wagner A. Recent advances in mono- and combined stem cell therapies of stroke in animal models and humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:6029. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236029 PMid:31795466 PMCid:PMC6928803 |
||||
| 12. Yoshida Y, Takagi T, Kuramoto Y, Tatebayashi K, Shirakawa M, Yamahara K, et al. Intrave-nous administration of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells in the subacute phase of cerebral infarction in a mouse model ameliorates neurological disturbance by suppressing blood brain barrier disruption and apoptosis via immunomodulation. Cell Transplant. 2021; 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897211024183 PMid:34144647 PMCid:PMC8216398 |
||||
| 13. Zhang Lei, Wang Lin-Mei, Chen Wei-Wei, Ma Zhi, Han Xiao, Liu Cheng-Ming, et al. Neural differentiation of human Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves the recovery of neurological function after transplantation in ischemic stroke rats. Neural Re-generation Research. 2017; 12(7):1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.211189 PMid:28852392 PMCid:PMC5558489 |
||||
| 14. Li J, Zhang Q, Wang W, Lin F, Wang S, Zhao J. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: a look into treatment mechanism and therapeutic potential. J Neurol. 2020; 1-13:4095-4107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10138-5 PMid:32761505 |
||||
| 15. Wang F, Tang H, Zhu J, Zhang JH. Transplanting mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of ischemic stroke. Cell Transplant. 2018; 27(12):1825-1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689718795424 PMid:30251564 PMCid:PMC6300770 |
||||
| 16. Li Z, Ye H, Cai X, et al. Bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells modulate microglial activa-tion in the peri-infarct area in rats during the acute phase of stroke. Brain Res Bull. 2019; 153:324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.001 PMid:31589902 |
||||
| 17. Nam HS, Kwon I, Lee BH, Kim H, Kim J, An S, et al. Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment on the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Angiogenesis during Ischemic Stroke Recovery. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0144218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144218 PMid:26637168 PMCid:PMC4670145 |
||||
| 18. He B, Yao Q, Liang Z, Lin J, Xie Y, Li S, et al. The Dose of Intravenously Transplanted Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Determines the Therapeutic Effect on Vascular Remodeling in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke. Cell Transplant. 2016; 25(12):2173-2185. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368916X692627 PMid:27480476 |
||||
| 19. Chen Y, Peng D, Li J, Zhang L, Chen J, Wang L, et al. A comparative study of different dos-es of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve post-stroke neurological out-comes via intravenous transplantation. Brain Res. 2023; 1798:148161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148161 PMid:36379315 |
||||
| 20. Kawabori M, Kuroda S, Ito M, Shichinohe H, Houkin K, Kuge Y, et al. Timing and cell dose determine therapeutic effects of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in rat model of cerebral infarct. Neuropathology. 2013; 33(2):140-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01335.x PMid:22725254 |
||||
| 21. Available from: https://zakononline.com.ua/documents/show/32024___32024 | ||||
| 22. Lyden J, Grant S, Ma T. Altered metabolism for neuroprotection provided by mesenchymal stem cells. Brain Circ. 2019; 5:140-144. https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_36_19 PMid:31620662 PMCid:PMC6785946 |
||||
| 23. Konovalov S, Moroz V, Konovalova N, Deryabina O, Shuvalova N, Toporova O, et al. The effect of mesenchymal stromal cells of various origins on mortality and neurologic deficit in acute cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Cell Organ Transpl. 2021; 9(2):104-108. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v9i2.132 |
||||
| 24. Konovalov SV, Moroz VM, Deryabina OG, et al. Restoration of the nervous system in acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain by intravenous administration of mesenchymal stromal cells of different origin. Adv Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2023; 9(1):60-65. https://doi.org/10.15406/atroa.2023.09.00142 |
||||
| 25. Khodakovsky AA, Marinich LI, Bagauri OV. Features of postreperfusion neuronal damage formation – characterization of the “ischemia-reperfusion” model. New directions and pro-spects for the development of modern cerebroprotective therapy of ischemic stroke. Physi-cian Assistant. 2013; 3(58): 69-76. [In Russian] | ||||
| 26. Chen Y, Peng D, Li J, Zhang L, Chen J, Wang L, et al. A comparative study of different dos-es of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve post-stroke neurological out-comes via intravenous transplantation. Brain Res. 2023; 1798:148161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148161 PMid:36379315 |
||||
| 27. Kawabori M, Kuroda S, Ito M, Shichinohe H, Houkin K, Kuge Y, et al. Timing and cell dose determine therapeutic effects of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in rat model of cerebral infarct. Neuropathology. 2013; 33(2):140-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01335.x PMid:22725254 |
||||
| 28. Secades JJ. Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review. Rev Neurol. 2016; 63(03):1-73. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.75S05.2022311 PMid:36544369 |
||||
| 29. Diederich K, Frauenknecht K, Minnerup J, et al. Citicoline enhances neuroregenerative pro-cesses after experimental stroke in rats [published correction appears in Stroke. 2012; 43(11):e169. Stroke. 2012; 43(7):1931-1940. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.654806 PMid:22581817 |
||||
| 30. Bustamante A, Giralt D, Garcia-Bonilla L, et al. Citicoline in pre-clinical animal models of stroke: a meta-analysis shows the optimal neuroprotective profile and the missing steps for jumping into a stroke clinical trial. J Neurochem. 2012; 123(2):217-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07891.x PMid:22845688 |
||||
| 31. Mehta A, Mahale R, Buddaraju K, et al. Efficacy of Neuroprotective Drugs in Acute Is-chemic Stroke: Is It Helpful? JNRP. 2019; 10(4):576-581. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-170079 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700790 PMid:31831974 PMCid:PMC6906097 |
||||
| 32. Lee MC, Jin CY, Kim HS, et al. Stem cell dynamics in an experimental model of stroke. CMJ. 2011; 47(2):90-98. https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2011.47.2.90 PMid:22111067 PMCid:PMC3214868 |
||||
| 33. Pedachenko EG, Moroz VV, Yatsyk VA, Malyar UI, Liubich LD, Egorova DM. Autologous cell using for the restoration of functional defects in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular accident. 2020; 33(3):83-93. https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2020-3(33)-83-93 |
||||
| 34. Toyoshima A, Yasuhara T, Kameda M, Morimoto J, Takeuchi H, Wang F. Intra-arterial transplantation of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells mounts neuroprotective effects in a transient ischemic stroke model in rats: analyses of therapeutic time window and its mecha-nisms. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0127302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127302 PMid:26075717 PMCid:PMC4468176 |
||||
| 35. Lee MC, Jin CY, Kim HS, et al. Stem cell dynamics in an experimental model of stroke. CMJ. 2011; 47(2):90-98. https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2011.47.2.90 PMid:22111067 PMCid:PMC3214868 |
||||
| 36. Molofsky Av, Krenick R, Ullian E, et al. Astrocytes and disease: a neurodevelopmental per-spective. Genes Dev. 2012; 26(9):891-907. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.188326.112 PMid:22549954 PMCid:PMC3347787 |
||||
| 37. Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron. 2014; 81(2):229-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034 PMid:24462092 PMCid:PMC3984950 |
||||
| 38. Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015; 7(2):a020420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020420 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020420 PMid:25380660 PMCid:PMC4315924 |
||||
| 39. Liu Z, Li Y, Cui Y, Roberts C, Lu M, Wilhelmsson U, et al. Beneficial effects of gfap/vimentin reactive astrocytes for axonal remodeling and motor behavioral recovery in mice after stroke. Glia. 2014; 62:2022-2033. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22723 PMid:25043249 PMCid:PMC4307923 |
||||
| 40. Ohtake Y, Li S. Molecular mechanisms of scar-sourced axon growth inhibitors. Brain Res. 2015, 1619:22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.064 PMid:25192646 PMCid:PMC4345149 |
||||
| 41. Asgari Taei A, Nasoohi S, Hassanzadeh G, Kadivar M, Dargahi L, Farahmandfar M. En-hancement of angiogenesis and neurogenesis by intracerebroventricular injection of secre-tome from human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells in ischemic stroke model. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021; 140:111709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111709 PMid:34020250 |
||||
| 42. Seo HG, Yi Y, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Neuroprotective effect of secreted factors from human adi-pose stem cells in a rat stroke model. Neurol Res. 2017; 39(12):1114-1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2017.1379293 PMid:28948857 |
||||
| 43. Li Z, Ye H, Cai X, Sun W, He B, Yang Z, et al. Bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells mod-ulate microglial activation in the peri-infarct area in rats during the acute phase of stroke. Brain Res Bull. 2019; 153:324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.001 PMid:31589902 |
||||
| 44. Hsieh JY, Wang HW, Chang SJ, Liao KH, Lee IH, Lin WS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord express preferentially secreted factors related to neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e72604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072604 PMid:23991127 PMCid:PMC3749979 |
||||
Konovalov S, Moroz V, Konovalova N, Deryabina O, Toporova O, Tochylovsky A, Kordium V. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of various origin reduce reactive gliosis in the hippocampal CA1 area during acute ischemia-reperfusion of the rat brain. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023; 11(2):122-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.159

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

