Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2023; 11(2):88-95.
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v11i2.154
The improvement of endothelial function by inhibition of platelet activity using acetylsalicylic acid in patients with arterial hypertension
Talaieva T.
, Mishchenko L.
, Tretyak I.
, Matova O.
, Vasilinchuk N.
, Vavilova L
- M. D. Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
In accordance with modern ideas about the pathogenesis of thrombotic complications of cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, stroke), it should be noted that platelets and platelet humoral factors play a key role in the development of thrombosis. Activated platelets are able to activate both endotheliocytes and pro-inflammatory cells – monocytes/macrophages, which take a direct part in the formation and progression of atherosclerotic plaque.
The purpose of the study is to determine the possibility of improving the function of the endothelium by suppressing the activity of platelets using acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients with arterial hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.
Methods. 41 patients with arterial hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 20 patients who were taking ASA before the start of the study; group 2 consisted of 21 patients who did not receive ASA before participating in the study. During the study, patients of both groups received ASA (75 mg once a day) for 6 months as part of basic therapy (antihypertensives, statins). In all patients, before the start of the study and at the final stage, the activity of platelets was determined by the expression of glycoproteins GPIIb (CD41), GPIIIa (CD61) and P-selectin, as well as the content in the blood of endothelial progenitor cells (CD45–CD31+CD133+) and desquamated endothelial cells (CD45–CD31+CD133–) by flow cytometry. The content of C-reactive protein, cytokines TNF-α and IL-10 and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in the blood was determined by ELISA. All patients underwent a test with flow-dependent vasodilation of the brachial artery.
Results. In patients who did not receive ASA before the start of the study, the activity of platelets in the peripheral blood was higher, signs of more pronounced endothelial dysfunction than in patients who received ASA were noted. After 6 months of taking ASA on the background of standard antihypertensive therapy, the level of activation of platelets decreased in patients of both groups. In the patients of group 1, the expression of CD41 decreased by 31.8 % (p < 0.01), CD61 – by 15.2 % (p < 0.01). In group 2, the suppression of platelet activity was even more pronounced: the level of CD41 decreased by 55.2 % (p < 0.001), CD61 – by 27.5 % (p < 0.05). In patients of group 1, the percentage of P-selectin-expressing platelets decreased by 78.1 % (p < 0.01); in group 2, the number of such platelets also decreased significantly – by 42.5 % (р < 0.05). The number of endothelial progenitors in the blood increased significantly in both groups: 3 times in patients of group 1 (p < 0.001); 2.3 times – in patients of group 2 (p < 0.001). In patients of both groups, a significant (2-fold) increase in the endothelium-dependent vasodilatation index was observed (p < 0.01). At the end of the study, a decrease in the blood level of CRP by 12.2 % and 18.8 %, pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α by 50.0 % and 57.0 %, respectively, was found in patients of groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. The suppression of platelet activity in response to acetylsalicylic acid in patients with arterial hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases was accompanied by alterations in the intensity of systemic inflammation and the restoration of endothelial functions.
Key words: platelets; endothelial progenitor cells; endothelial dysfunction; arterial hypertension; acetylsalicylic acid
Full Text PDF
| 1. Madhur MS, Elijovich F, Alexande M, et al. Hypertension. Do Inflammation and Immunity Hold the Key to Solving this Epidemic? Circ Res. 2021; 128:908-933. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318052 PMid:33793336 PMCid:PMC8023750 |
||||
| 2. Li Q, Youn JY, Cai H. Mechanisms and consequences of endothelial nitric oxide synthase dysfunction in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2015; 33:1128-1136. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000587 PMid:25882860 PMCid:PMC4816601 |
||||
| 3. Puzyk SG. Endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension and progression of atherosclerosis. Fam Med. 2018; 2(76):69-74. https://doi.org/10.30841/2307-5112.2.2018.145561 |
||||
| 4. Gawaz M, Langer H, May AE. Platelets in inflammation and atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115:3378-84. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI27196 PMid:16322783 PMCid:PMC1297269 |
||||
| 5. Hamilos M, Petousis S, Parthenakis F. Interaction between platelets and endothelium: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic options. CDT. 2018; 8(5):568-580. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2018.07.01 PMid:30498682 PMCid:PMC6232347 |
||||
| 6. Boehlen F, Clemetson KJ. Platelet chemokines and their receptors: what is their relevance to platelet storage and transfusion practice? Transfus Med. 2001;11:403-17. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3148.2001.00340.x PMid:11851938 |
||||
| 7. Bombeli T, Schwartz BR, Harlan JM. Adhesion of activated platelets to endothelial cells: evidence for a GPIIbIIIa-dependent bridging mechanism and novel roles for endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), alphavbeta3 integrin, and GPIbalpha. J Exp Med. 1998; 187:329-39. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.187.3.329 PMid:9449713 PMCid:PMC2212123 |
||||
| 8. Muttia Amalia, Meidi Utami Puteri, Fadlina Chany Saputri, Rani Sauriasari, Bambang Widyantoro. Platelet Glycoprotein-Ib (GPIb) May Serve as a Bridge between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Atherosclerosis, Making It a Potential Target for Antiplatelet Agents in T2DM Patients. Life. 2023; 13(7):1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071473 PMid:37511848 PMCid:PMC10381765 |
||||
| 9. Zaverio M. Ruggeri, G. Loredana Mendolicchio Adhesion Mechanisms in Platelet Function Circulation Research. 2007; 100:1673-1685. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000267878.97021.ab PMid:17585075 |
||||
| 10. Sun Young Cho , Mina Hur Expanded Impacts of Platelet Functions: Beyond Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Ann Lab Med. 2019; 39(4):343-344. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.343 PMid:30809979 PMCid:PMC6400714 |
||||
| 11. Kovalenko VM, Lutai MI, Sirenko YuM, Sychov OS. Cardiovascular diseases. Classification, standards of diagnosis and treatment. Kyiv: MORION; 2021. 320 p. [In Ukrainian] | ||||
| 12. Chyrchel B, Kruszelnicka O, Surdacki A. Endothelial biomarkers and platelet reactivity on ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients after acute coronary syndrome with and without concomitant type 2 diabetes: a preliminary observational study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022; 21(1):249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01685-4 PMid:36397167 PMCid:PMC9670560 |
||||
| 13. McEver RP. Adhesive interactions of leukocytes, platelets, and the vessel wall during hemostasis and inflammation. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 86:746-56. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1616128 PMid:11583304 |
||||
| 14. Otterdal K, Smith C, Oie E, et al. Platelet-derived LIGHT induces inflammatory responses in endothelial cells and monocytes. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-09-010629 PMid:16861346 |
||||
| 15. Totani L, Evangelista V. Platelet-leukocyte interactions in cardiovascular disease and beyond. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010; 30:2357-61. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207480 PMid:21071701 PMCid:PMC3076621 |
||||
| 16. van Gils JM, Zwaginga JJ, Hordijk PL. Molecular and functional interactions among monocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells and their relevance for cardiovascular diseases. J Leukoc Biol. 2009; 85:195-204. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0708400 PMid:18948548 |
||||
| 17. Daniëlle M Coenen, Tom G Mastenbroek, Judith MEM. Cosemans. Platelet interaction with activated endothelium: mechanistic insights from microfluidics. Blood. 2017; 130(26):2819-2828. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-04-780825 PMid:29018081 |
||||
| 18. Frenette PS, Denis CV, Weiss L, Jurk K, Subbarao S, Kehrel B, et al. P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) is expressed on platelets and can mediate platelet-endothelial interactions in vivo. J Exp Med. 2000; 191(8):1413-22. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.191.8.1413 PMid:10770806 PMCid:PMC2193129 |
||||
| 19. Dole VS, Bergmeier W, Patten IS, Hirahashi J, Mayadas TN, Wagner DD. PSGL-1 regulates platelet P-selectin-mediated endothelial activation and shedding of P-selectin from activated platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2007; 98(4):806-12. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH07-03-0207 PMid:17938805 |
||||
| 20. Braun OO, Slotta JE, Menger MD, Erlinge D, Thorlacius H. Primary and secondary capture of platelets onto inflamed femoral artery endothelium is dependent on P-selectin and PSGL-1. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008; 592(1-3):128-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.06.102 PMid:18644365 |
||||
| 21. Schulz C, Schäfer A, Stolla M, et al. Chemokine fractalkine mediates leukocyte recruitment to inflammatory endothelial cells in flowing whole blood: a critical role for P-selectin expressed on activated platelets. Circulation. 2007; 116:764-773. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695189 PMid:17679613 |
||||
| 22. Weber C. Platelets and chemokines in atherosclerosis: partners in crime. Circ Res. 2005; 96:612-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000160077.17427.57 PMid:15802619 |
||||
| 23. Frenette PS, Johnson RC, Hynes RO. Platelets roll on stimulated endothelium in vivo: an interaction mediated by endothelial P-selectin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995; 92:7450-4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.16.7450 PMid:7543682 PMCid:PMC41357 |
||||
| 24. Kraaijeveld AO, de Jager SC, de Jager WJ, et al. CC chemokine ligand-5 (CCL5/ RANTES) and CC chemokine ligand-18 (CCL18/PARC) are specific markers of refractory unstable angina pectoris and are transiently raised during severe ischemic symptom. Circulation. 2007; 116:1931-41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.706986 PMid:17909104 |
||||
| 25. Raz O, Lev DL, Battler A, et al. Pathways Mediating the Interaction between Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and Platelets. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e95156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095156 PMid:24901498 PMCid:PMC4046960 |
||||
| 26. Karaahmet F, Kocaman S.A. Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Overcome Vascular Deterioration and Cytokine Storm in Critical Patients with COVID-19. Med Hypotheses. 2020; 144:109973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109973 PMid:32590321 PMCid:PMC7286257 |
||||
| 27. Cardiovascular diseases. Classification, standards of diagnosis and treatment / Edit. by Kovalenko VM, Lutai MI, Sirenko YM, Sychev OS. 6th edition, revised and supplemented, K.: 4th wave. 2023. 384 p. [In Ukrainian] | ||||
| 28. Bulut D, Becker V, Mügge A. Acetylsalicylate reduces endothelial and platelet-derived microparticles in patients with coronary artery disease. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011; 89(4). https://doi.org/10.1139/y11-013 PMid:21539467 |
||||
| 29. Bonello L, Frere C, Cointe S, Laine M, Mancini J, Thuny F, et al. Ticagrelor increases endothelial progenitor cell level compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: A prospective randomized study. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 187:502-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.414 PMid:25846661 |
||||
| 30. Jeong HS, Hong SJ, Cho SA, Kim JH, Cho JY, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for Inflammation, Vascular Function, and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetic Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Requiring Coronary Stenting: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(16):1646-1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.064 PMid:28838475 |
||||
Talaieva T, Mishchenko L, Tretyak I, Matova O, Vasilinchuk N, Vavilova L. The improvement of endothelial function by inhibiting platelet activity using acetylsalicylic acid in patients with arterial hypertension. Cell Organ Transpl. 2023; 11(2):88-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.154

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

