Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2021; 9(1):54-58.
DOI: 10.22494/cot.v9i1.122
Different type of matrix for cardiac implants: biomedical and bioengineering aspects
Shchotkina N.1,2,3
, Sokol A.1, Dolinchuk L.2, Skorohod I.3, Filipov R.2, Shepeleva O.2, Rudenko N.1, Yemets I.1
- 1Ukrainian Children’s Cardiac Center, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 2Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, National Technical University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
- 3Xpand LLC, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
The rapid growth of cardiovascular morbidity and high mortality rates of patients with congenital heart disease requiring surgery have led to the search for new modern approaches to the treatment of these groups of patients. The main trends today include the use of cardiaс implants of synthetic and biological origin. Of particular interest are scaffolds based on the decellularized extracellular matrix, which in its functional and structural characteristics is close to the native pericardium. In contrast to synthetic analogues, such grafts can fully replace a tissue or an organ defects, and then integrate and function properly.
This review presents the characteristics of different types of matrices used in cardiac surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of commercially available cardiac bioimplants currently used in the world are analyzed.
Keywords: tissue engineering; cardiac bioimplant; extracellular matrix
Full Text PDF| 1. Hacker MC, Krieghoff J, Mikos AG. Synthetic Polymers. In: Atala A, editor. Principles of Regenerative Medicine. 3 ed. Academic Press; 2018. pp. 1428-1428. | ||||
| 2. Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-Generation Biomedical Materials. Science. 2002;295(5557):1014-1017. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067404 PMid:11834817 |
||||
| 3. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3675-3683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 PMid:16519932 |
||||
| 4. Taylor PM, Cass AEG, Yacoub MH Extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering heart valves. Prog. Paediatr. Cardiol. 2006a;21:219-225. doi:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2005.11.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppedcard.2005.11.010 |
||||
| 5. Chlupac J, Filova E, Havlikova J, et. al. The gene expression of human endothelial cells is modulated by subendothelial extracellular matrix proteins: short-term response to laminar shear stress. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(15-16):2253-64. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0153. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0153 PMid:24606163 PMCid:PMC4137337 |
||||
| 6. d’Ayala G. G., Malinconico M., Laurienzo P. Marine derived polysaccharides for biomedical applications: chemical modification approaches. Molecules. 2008;13, 2069-2106. doi:10.3390/molecules13092069. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13092069 PMid:18830142 PMCid:PMC6245343 |
||||
| 7. Chevallay B, Herbage D. Collagen-based biomaterials as 3D scaffold for cell cultures: applications for tissue engineering and gene therapy. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2000;38:211-218. doi:10.1007/BF02344779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344779 PMid:10829416 |
||||
| 8. Chung-Welch N, Patton WF, Yen-Patton GP, et. al. Phenotypic comparison between mesothelial and microvascular endothelial cell lineages using conventional endothelial cell markers, cytoskeletal protein markers and in vitro assays of angiogenic potential. Differentiation. 1989;42(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1989.tb00606.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1989.tb00606.x PMid:2482821 |
||||
| 9. Fan T, Ma X, Zhao J, et. al. Transplantation of tissue-engineered human corneal endothelium in cat models. Mol Vis. 2013;19:400-7. | ||||
| 10. Pawan KC, Yi Hong, Ge Zhang. Cardiac tissue-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for myocardial repair: advantages and challenges. Regen Biomater. 2019; 6(4): 185-199. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbz017. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbz017 PMid:31404421 PMCid:PMC6683951 |
||||
| 11. Shchotkina NV, Sokol AA, Galkin OYu, et. al. Optimized method of bovine pericardium decellularization for tissue engineering. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(4):815-820. doi: 10.36740/WLek202104101. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202104101 PMid:34155985 |
||||
| 12. Sokol AA, Grekov DA, Yemets GI, Galkin AYu., et. al. The efficiency of decellularization of bovine pericardium by different concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Innov Biosyst Bioeng. 2020; 4(4): 189-198. doi: 10.20535/ibb.2020.4.4.214765. https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2020.4.4.214765 |
||||
| 13. Sultanova AS, Bespalova OYa, Galkin OYu. Stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue as an alternative source of cellular material for regenerative medicine. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2021; 93(1): 40-50. doi: 10.15407/ubj93.01.040. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj93.01.040 |
||||
| 14. Wilshaw SP, Kearney JN, Fisher J, et. al. Production of an acellular amniotic membrane matrix for use in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(8):2117-29. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2117. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2117 PMid:16968153 |
||||
| 15. Quintessenza J.A., Jacobs J.P., Chai P.J., et. al. Polytetrafluoroethylene bicuspid pulmonary valve implantation: experience with 126 patients. World J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart Surg. 2010;1:20-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135110361509 PMid:23804719 |
||||
| 16. Quintessenza J.A., Jacobs J.P., Morell V.O., et. al. Initial experience with a bicuspid polytetrafluoroethylene pulmonary valve in 41 children and adults: a new option for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005;79:924-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.045 PMid:15734406 |
||||
| 17. Choi K.H., Sung S.C., Kim H., et. al. Late results of right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with a bicuspid expanded polytetrafluoroethylene valved conduit. J. Card. Surg. 2018;33:36-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.13507 PMid:29314335 |
||||
| 18. Grigorieva SM, Starosyla DB, Rybalko SL, et. al. Effect of recombinant human interleukin-7 on Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2019; 91(5): 7-15. doi: 10.15407/ubj91.05.007. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj91.05.007 |
||||
| 19. Perkasem K, Rothwell PM Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;3. Art. No.: CD000071. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000071.pub3. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000071.pub3 PMid:20238308 PMCid:PMC7032696 |
||||
| 20. Klopsch C, Steinhoff G. Tissue-engineered devices in cardiovascular surgery. Eur Surg Res. 2012;49(1):44-52. doi: 10.1159/000339606. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339606 PMid:22813649 |
||||
| 21. Mishra PK, Ashoub A, Salhiyyah K Role of topical application of gentamicin containing collagen implants in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-122 PMid:25005533 PMCid:PMC4227288 |
||||
| 22. Weber M, Gonzalez de Torre, Moreira R, et. al. Multiple-Step Injection Molding for Fibrin-Based Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves.Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015 1; 21(8): 832-840. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0396 https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0396 PMid:25654448 PMCid:PMC4523041 |
||||
| 23. Miriam W, Israel GdT, Ricardo M, et. al. Multiple-step injection molding for fibrin-based tissue-engineered heart valves. Tissue Eng. Part C. 2015;21:832-840. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0396 PMid:25654448 PMCid:PMC4523041 |
||||
| 24. Galkin OYu, Komar AG, Besarab OB. Different mice inbred strains humoral immune response against human prostate-specific antigen. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2019; 91(1): 30-37. doi: 10.15407/ubj91.01.030. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj91.01.030 |
||||
| 25. Naficy S, Brown HR, Razal J.M., et. al. Progress toward robust polymer hydrogels. Aust. J. Chem. 2011;64:1007-1025. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH11156 |
||||
| 26. Taylor PM. Biological matrices and bionanotechnology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362(1484):1313-1320. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2117. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2117 PMid:17581810 PMCid:PMC2440397 |
||||
| 27. Tsai SH, Liu YW, Tang WC, et. al. Characterization of porcine arterial endothelial cells cultured on amniotic membrane, a potential matrix for vascular tissue engineering. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357(4):984-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.047 PMid:17459341 |
||||
| 28. Vesely I, Ramamurthi A. Evaluation of the matrix-synthesis potential of crosslinked hyaluronan gels for tissue engineering of aortic heart valves. Biomaterials. 2005;26:999-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.016 PMid:15369688 |
||||
| 29. Lam NT, Lam H, Sturdivant NM, Balachandran K. Fabrication of a matrigel-collagen semi-interpenetrating scaffold for use in dynamic valve interstitial cell culture. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(4):045013. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa71be. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa71be PMid:28484097 |
||||
| 30. Rhee S, Puetzer JL, Mason BN, et. al. 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016;2:1800-1805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00288 PMid:33440478 |
||||
| 31. Lim LS, Poh RW, Riau AK, et. al. Biological and ultrastructural properties of acelagraft, a freeze-dried γ-irradiated human amniotic membrane. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(10):1303-10. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.222. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.222 PMid:20938000 |
||||
| 32. Chen L, Zhu Y, Li Y, et. al. Progress and prospect of electrospun silk fibroin in construction of tissue-engineering scaffold. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2011;27(6):831-7. | ||||
| 33. Yetkin G, Uludag M, Citgez B, et. al. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions by intraperitoneal administration of vitamin E and human amniotic membrane. Int J Surg. 2009;7(6):561-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.007 PMid:19800036 |
||||
| 34. Nastenko IeA, Maksymenko VB, Potashev SV, et. al. Random forest algorithm construction for the diagnosis of coronary heart diseasebased on echocardiography video data streams. Innov Biosyst Bioeng. 2021; 5(1): 61-69. doi: 10.20535/ibb.2021.5.1.225794. https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2021.5.1.225794 |
||||
| 35. Jaganathan SK, Supriyanto E, Murugesan S, et. al. Biomaterials in cardiovascular research: applications and clinical implications. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:459465. DOI: 10.1155/2014/459465. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/459465 PMid:24895577 PMCid:PMC4033350 |
||||
| 36. Lima Ed, Ferrasi AC, Kaasi A Decellularization of Human Pericardium with Potential Application in Regenerative Medicine. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(1): 18-19. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190130. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190130 |
||||
| 37. Lutsenko TN, Kovalenko MV, Galkin OYu. Validation of biological activity testing procedure of recombinant human interleukin-7. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2017; 89(1): 82-89. doi: 10.15407/ubj89.01.082. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj89.01.082 PMid:29236393 |
||||
| 38. Ma B, Wang X, Wu C, Chang J. Crosslinking strategies for preparation of extracellular matrix-derived cardiovascular scaffolds. Regen Biomater. 2014;1(1):81-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbu009 PMid:26816627 PMCid:PMC4669006 |
||||
| 39. Gratzer PF, Harrison RD, Woods T. Matrix alteration and not residual sodium dodecyl sulfate cytotoxicity affects the cellular repopulation of a decellularized matrix. Tissue Eng. 2006 Oct;12(10):2975-83. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2975. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2975 PMid:17518665 |
||||
| 40. Obermiller JF, Hodde JP, McAlexander CS, et. al. A comparison of suture retention strengths of three biomaterials. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10(1):I1-5. | ||||
| 41. Kim GE, Kwon TW, Cho YP, et. al. Carotid endarterectomy with bovine patch angioplasty: a preliminary report. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;9(5):458-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(01)00042-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(01)00042-4 |
||||
| 42. Us MH, Sungun M, Sanioglu S, et. al. A retrospective comparison of bovine pericardium and polytetrafluoroethylene patch for closure of ventricular septal defects. J Int Med Res. 2004;32(2):218-21. doi: 10.1177/147323000403200216. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000403200216 PMid:15080027 |
||||
| 43. Gomes WJ, Leal JC, Jatene FB, et. al. Experimental Study and Early Clinical Application Of a Sutureless Aortic Bioprosthesis. Case Reports Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;30(5):515-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150072. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20150072 |
||||
| 44. Holoshitz N, Kavinsky CJ, Hijazi ZM The Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: A Review of the Valve, Procedure, and Current Literature Cardiol Ther. 2012;1(1):6. doi:10.1007/s40119-012-0006-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-012-0006-8 PMid:25135160 PMCid:PMC4107442 |
||||
| 45. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03669042 | ||||
| 46. Laura Iop, Tiziana Palmosi, Eleonora Dal Sasso, Gino Gerosa. Bioengineered tissue solutions for repair, correction and reconstruction in cardiovascular surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(Suppl 20): S2390-S2411. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.27. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.27 PMid:30123578 PMCid:PMC6081367 |
||||
| 47. Salameh A, Greimann W, Vondrys D, et. al. Calcification or not. This is the question. A 1-year study of bovine pericardial vascular patches (CardioCel) in minipigs. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;30(1):54-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.09.013. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.09.013 PMid:29024719 |
||||
| 48. Herijgers P, Ozaki S , Verbeken E, et. al. The No-React anticalcification treatment: a comparison of Biocor No-React II and Toronto SPV stentless bioprostheses implanted in sheep.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999;11(4):171-5. | ||||
| 49. De Martino A, Milano AD, Bortolotti U Use of Pericardium for Cardiac Reconstruction Procedures in Acquired Heart Diseases-A Comprehensive Review. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69(1):83-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697918. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697918 PMid:31604358 |
||||
| 50. Sokol AA, Grekov DA, Yemets GI, et. al. Biocompatibility analysis of the decellularized bovine pericardium. Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2020; 8(2): 112-116. doi: 10.22494/cot.v8i2.110. https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v8i2.110 |
||||
| 51. Sokol AA, Grekov DA, Yemets GI, et. al. Comparison of bovine pericardium decellularization protocols for production of biomaterial for cardiac surgery. Biopolym. Cell., 2020; 36(5):392-403. doi: 10.7124/bc.000A3C. https://doi.org/10.7124/bc.000A3C |
||||
Shchotkina N, Sokol A, Dolinchuk L, Skotohod I, Filipov R, Shepeleva O, Rudenko N, Yemets I. Different type of matrix for cardiac implants: biomedical and bioengineering aspects. Cell Organ Transpl. 2021; 9(1):54-58. doi:10.22494/cot.v9i1.122
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.