Cell and Organ Transplantology. 2020; 8(2):177-186.
Dynamics of morphological changes in neural cell culture with a model of neurotrauma under the influence of conditioned media of the rat fetal brain neurogenic cells
- Romodanov State Institute of Neurosurgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
A potential strategy for recovery and regeneration of brain damage due to traumatic brain injury is considered to be the transplantation of neurogenic stem and/or progenitor cells (NSCs/NPCs). The key factors of the regenerative non-targeted effects of NSCs/NPCs (so-called bystander effects) include the signal molecules produced by them into the extracellular environment (secretome).
The purpose is to study the regenerative bystander effects of rat fetal brain neurogenic cells (FBNCs) in the in vitro model of neurotrauma.
Materials and methods. In cell culture of FBNCs from rat fetuses (E14-16), neurotrauma was modeled in vitro by mechanical scratching of monolayer and conditioned medium obtained from 24-h cultures of rat FBNCs was added. Cell phenotype was evaluated by morphological features and by immunocytochemical staining for Nestin and GFAP. The density and length of processes, migration capacity, the cell growth rate and monolayer density in the scratched area were compared. Morphometric study included analysis of the width of the scratched area, the number of migrating cells, the distance of migration and mitotic activity in the intact monolayer.
Results. Under the conditions of the nutrient medium of standard composition in the scratched area the signs of endogenous regeneration are shown during 24-48 h of cultivation. The overgrowth of cell processes from monolayer and short distance migration of single undifferentiated or poorly differentiated cells were shown. In the next 72-96 h of observation, the degeneration of migrated cells and processes in the scratched area was detected. Under the influence of conditioned media from 24-h cultures of FBNCs by single addition immediately after scratching at dose of 0.1 mg/ml for protein content the stimulation of regeneration were detected up to 96 hours of cultivation. The migration of cell processes from the monolayer simultaneously with undifferentiated or poorly differentiated cells at 24 hours was shown. The formation of cell clusters and their differentiation (at 48 h), as well as migration of differentiated cells with partial or complete overgrowth of scratched area (72-96 h) were observed. The morphological signs of degeneration of migrated cells in the scratched area appeared only on the 8th day of cultivation. Conditioned media does not affect qualitative and quantitative properties of the culture of rat FBNCs in the intact area where mitotic activity was average.
Conclusions. Conditioned medium from 24-h cultures of rat FBNC can stimulate reparation in the in vitro model of neurotrauma in neural cell culture for at least 7 days at a single addition, without affecting the cellular composition and mitotic activity of the intact monolayer.
Key words: neural cells culture; scratch assay; fetal brain neurogenic cells; conditioned mediaFull Text PDF (eng) Full Text PDF (ua)
|1. Peeters W, van den Brande R, Polinder S, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2015; 157(10):1683-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2512-7.
|2. Pedachenko EG, Verhoglyadova TP, Morozov AN. Kliniko-morfologicheskaya kharakteristika tyazheloy cherepno-mozgovoy travmy [Clinical and morphological characteristics of severe traumatic brain injury]. Byul UAN − Bull NAS. 1998; 7:28-32. [In Russian]|
|3. Chayka AV, Zaben’ko YY, Labunets IF, Pivneva TA. Traumatic brain injury: pathogenesis, experimental models, prospects of cell-based therapy. JCOT. 2017; 5(2):209-215. DOI:10.22494/cot.v5i2.78.
|4. Ludwig PE, Thankam FG, Patil AA, et al. Brain injury and neural stem cells. Neural Regen Res. 2018; 13(1):7-18.
|5. SanDekmak A, Mantash S, Shaito A, et al. Stem cells and combination therapy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 340:49-62.
|6. Weston NM, Sun D. The Potential of Stem Cells in Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018; 18(1):1. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0812-z.
|7. Wennersten A, Meier X, Holmin S, et al. Proliferation, migration and differentiation of human neural stem/progenitor cells after transplantation into a rat model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(1):88-96.
|8. Skardelly M, Gaber K, Burdack S, et al. Long-term benefit of human fetal neuronal progenitor cell transplantation in a clinically adapted model after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28(3):401-14.
|9. Rolfe A, Sun D. Stem Cell Therapy in Brain Trauma: Implications for Repair and Regeneration of Injured Brain in Experimental TBI Models. In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. 2015. Chapter 42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK299210.|
|10. Martino G, Pluchino S, Bonfanti L, Schwartz M. Brain regeneration in physiology and pathology: the immune signature driving therapeutic plasticity of neural stem cells. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91(4):1281-304. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2010.
|11. Willis CM, Nicaise AM, Hamel R, et al. Harnessing the Neural Stem Cell Secretome for Regenerative Neuroimmunology. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020; 14:590960. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2020.590960.
|12. Yang H, Wang C, Chen H, et al. Neural Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium Ameliorated Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats. Stem Cells Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4659159.
|13. Lladó J, Haenggeli C, Maragakis NJ, Snyder EY, Rothstein JD. Neural stem cells protect against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity and promote survival of injured motor neurons through the secretion of neurotrophic factors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004; 27(3):322-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.07.010.
|14. Mosher KI, Andres RH, Fukuhara T, et al. Neural Progenitor Cells Regulate Microglia Functions and Activity States. Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15(11): 1485-1487. DOI:10.1038/nn.3233.
|15. Bacigaluppi M, Russo GL, Peruzzotti-Jametti L, et al. Neural Stem Cell Transplantation Induces Stroke Recovery by Upregulating Glutamate Transporter GLT-1 in Astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(41):10529-44. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1643-16.2016.
|16. Zhang H, Shao B, Zhuge Q, et al. Cross-talk between human neural stem/progenitor cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in an allogeneic co-culture model. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117432. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117432.
|17. Jiao Q, Li X, An J, et al. Cell-Cell Connection Enhances Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation of Rat Embryonic Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017; 11:200. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00200.
|18. Liubich LD, Semenova VM, Stayno LP. Influence of rat progenitor neurogenic cells supernatant on glioma 101.8 cells in vitro. Biopolym Cell. 2015; 31(3):200-208.
|19. Gao M, Dong Q, Yao H, et al. Induced neural stem cells modulate microglia activation states vi CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling. Brain Behav Immun. 2017; 59: 288-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.09.020.
|20. Drago D, Cossetti C, Iraci N, et al. The stem cell secretome and its role in brain repair. Biochimie. 2013; 95(12):2271-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.06.020.
|21. Liang P, Liu J, Xiong J, et al. Neural Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium Protects Neurons and Promotes Propriospinal Neurons Relay Neural Circuit Reconnection After Spinal Cord Injury. Cell Transplantation. 2014; 23(1):S45-S56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368914X684989.
|22. Geranmayeh MH, Baghbanzadeh A, Barin A, et al. Paracrine Neuroprotective Effects of Neural Stem Cells on Glutamate- Induced Cortical Neuronal Cell Excitotoxicity. Adv Pharm Bull. 2015; 5(4):515-521. DOI: 10.15171/apb.2015.070.
|23. Doeppner TR, Traut V, Heidenreich A, et al. Conditioned Medium Derived from Neural Progenitor Cells Induces Long-term Post-ischemic Neuroprotection, Sustained Neurological Recovery, Neurogenesis, and Angiogenesis. Mol Neurobiol. 2017; 54(2):1531-1540. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-9748-y.
|24. Morrison B, Elkin BS, Dollé JP, Yarmush ML. In vitro models of traumatic brain injury. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011; 13:91-126.
|25. Kumaria A. In vitro models as a platform to investigate traumatic brain injury. Altern Lab Anim. 2017; 45(4):201-11.
|26. Sherman S, Phillips JK, Costa JT, et al. Stretch Injury of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neurons in a 96 Well Format. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6:34097. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34097.
|27. Phillips JK, Sherman SA, Oungoulian SR, Finan JD. Method for High Speed Stretch Injury of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Neurons in a 96-well Format. J Vis Exp. 2018; 134:57305. DOI: 10.3791/57305.
|28. Bonder DE, Keating CE, Chandra N, et al. Modeling Traumatic Brain Injury In Vitro. In: Srivastava AK, Cox CS, editors. Pre-Clinical and Clinical Methods in Brain Trauma Research. Springer Protocols, Humana Press, New York, NY, 2018:37-69.
|29. Tang-Schomer MD. Three-Dimensional In Vitro Brain Tissue Models. In: Srivastava AK, Cox CS, editors. Pre-Clinical and Clinical Methods in Brain Trauma Research. Springer Protocols, Humana Press, New York, NY, 2018:15-36.
|30. Salvador E, Burek M, Förster CY. An In Vitro Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1717:219-227. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7526-6_17.
|31. Ryou M, Mallet RT. An In Vitro Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Model for Studying Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of Neuronal Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1717:229-235. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7526-6_18.
|32. Robinson BD, Shaji CA, Lomas A, Tharakan B. Measurement of Microvascular Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction and Hyperpermeability In Vitro. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1717:237-242. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7526-6_19.
|33. Campos-Pires R, Yonis A, Macdonald W, et al. A Novel In Vitro Model of Blast Traumatic Brain Injury. J Vis Exp. 2018; 142. DOI: 10.3791/58400.
|34. Vasilieva IG, Chopyk NG, Oleksenko NP, et al. Modelyuvannya neyrotravmi ta regeneratsії serotonіnergіchnikh provіdnikh shlyakhіv v umovakh kul’tivuvannya [Modeling of neurotrauma and regeneration of serotonergic conduction pathways in the conditions of cultivation]. Eksperimental’na і klіnіchna meditsina − Experimental and clinical medicine. 2016; 4:112-119. [In Ukrainian]|
|35. Lööv C, Hillered L, Ebendal T, Erlandsson A. Engulfing Astrocytes Protect Neurons from Contact-Induced Apoptosis following Injury. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3):e33090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033090.
|36. Lööv C, Shevchenko G, Nadadhur AG, et al. Identification of injury specific proteins in a cell culture model of traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e55983. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0055983.
|37. Cheng Z, Bosco DB, Sun L, et al. Neural Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium Suppresses Inflammation and Promotes Spinal Cord Injury Recovery. Cell Transplant. 2017; 26(3):469-482. DOI: 10.3727/096368916X693473.
|38. Jia G, Yang H, Diao Z, et al. Neural stem cell conditioned medium alleviates Aβ25-35 damage to SH-SY5Y cells through the PCMT1/MST1 pathway. Eur J Histochem. 2020; 64(2):3135:34-40.
|39. Webb RL, Kaiser EE, Scoville SL, et al. Human Neural Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles Improve Tissue and Functional Recovery in the Murine Thromboembolic Stroke Model. Transl Stroke Res. 2018; (9):530-9.
|40. Zhong D, Cao Y, Li Ch-J, et al. Neural stem cell-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cordfunctional recovery after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Experimental Biology and Medicine 2020; 245: 54-65. DOI: 10.1177/1535370219895491.
|41. Colucci-D’Amato L, Speranza L, Volpicelli F. Neurotrophic Factor BDNF, Physiological Functions and Therapeutic Potential in Depression, Neurodegeneration and Brain Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(20):7777. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207777.
|42. Rodríguez-Martínez G, Velasco I. Activin and TGF-beta effects on brain development and neural stem cells. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2012; 11(7):844-55. DOI: 10.2174/1871527311201070844.
|43. Kamei N, Oishi Y, Tanaka N, et al. Neural progenitor cells promote corticospinal axon growth in organotypic co-cultures. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(17):2579-83. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200412030-00004.
|44. Merianda TT, Jin Y, Kalinski AL, et al. Neural Progenitor Cells Promote Axonal Growth and Alter Axonal mRNA Localization in Adult Neurons. Eneuro. 2017; 4(1):0171-16.2017. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0171-16.2017.
|45. Lee NM, Chae SA, Lee HJ. Effects of neural stem cell media on hypoxic injury in rat hippocampal slice cultures. Brain Res. 2017; 1677:20-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.09.018.
|46. Lim H-C, Lee S-T, Chu K, et al. Neuroprotective effect of neural stem cell-conditioned media in in vitro model of Huntington’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2008; 435(3):175-80. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.035.
|47. Gnanasegaran N, Govindasamy V, Musa S, Abu Kasim NH. ReNCell VM conditioned medium enhances the induction of dental pulp stem cells into dopaminergic like cells. Cytotechnology. 2016; 68:343-353. DOI 10.1007/s10616-014-9787-z.
|48. Ma K, Fox L, Shi G, et al. Generation of neural stem cell-like cells from bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Neurol Research. 2011; 33:1083-1093.
Pedachenko E, Liubich L, Staino L, Egorova D. Dynamics of morphological changes in neural cell culture with a model of neurotrauma under the influence of conditioned media of the rat fetal brain neurogenic cells. Cell Organ Transpl. 2020; 8(2):177-186. doi:10.22494/cot.v8i2.114